Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 1st Oct 2009 19:04 UTC
Yesterday morning, we ran an item on the Autodesk case, but we (as in: me) got all confused about what exactly was going on. As it turns out, I was right from the start; despite my update to the item, the case was not resolved. The link in the update referred to an earlier stage of the legal ramblings. However, we now have a real conclusion in this case - and once again, Autodesk lost: software is sold, not licensed. Note: Thanks to Brian W. Carver from Cyberlaw Cases for clearing everything up via email. Much appreciated!
Thread beginning with comment 387729
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:
2006-04-05
if software is sold and not licensed, then how can apple enforce it's eula and force people who buy it not to install it on compatible non apple computers?