
Yesterday morning, we
ran an item on the Autodesk case, but we (as in: me) got all confused about what exactly was going on. As it turns out, I was right from the start; despite my update to the item, the case was
not resolved. The link in the update referred to an
earlier stage of the legal ramblings. However, we now have a real conclusion in this case - and once again,
Autodesk lost: software is sold, not licensed.
Note: Thanks to Brian W. Carver from
Cyberlaw Cases for clearing everything up via email. Much appreciated!
Member since:
2006-04-05
if software is sold and not licensed, then how can apple enforce it's eula and force people who buy it not to install it on compatible non apple computers?