Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 7th Oct 2009 19:30 UTC, submitted by Moulinneuf
Thread beginning with comment 388340
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: How about doing this for Linux ?
by Slambert666 on Fri 9th Oct 2009 05:47
in reply to "RE[2]: How about doing this for Linux ?"
In what regards do they suck? I find VMWare Workstation very useful for testing on Ubuntu 9.04 64-bit; I regularly run about 5-7 VM's at a time on a 4 core, 8GB RAM machine.
Disk access primarily, The rest is fine.
VMware Workstation on windows has about 3 to 4 times better disk access speeds than (an optimized) Linux. The VMware developers claim that it is because Linux does not allow detailed control over dirty page write back.
The best workaround on Linux is to run only one VM at the time, use a physically separate disk for the VMs and if possible a hardware raid controller with battery backed cache (like a perc 5i for example).
Another possibility for speed up is raw partitions, but these require special configuration and makes the VM difficult to move around.
Finally you got iSCSI disks, and it also improves performance somewhat.
However the workarounds above also improves performance for the windows system so standard Linux still lags.





Member since:
2005-07-06
In what regards do they suck? I find VMWare Workstation very useful for testing on Ubuntu 9.04 64-bit; I regularly run about 5-7 VM's at a time on a 4 core, 8GB RAM machine.
On my MacBook Pro with 4GB, I run about 3 to 4. Also very useful.