Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 8th Oct 2009 22:04 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 388443
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: works just... works
by phoenix on Fri 9th Oct 2009 22:18
in reply to "RE: works just... works"
I never minded using Works, simple and fast, but the incompatibility between Works and standard Office files prevented it from actually being useful.
MS Works has always been able to open MS Word and MS Excel files.
It's the other way that (open .wks in Office) required the purchase of an expense add-on File Formats package. Talk about shooting themselves in the feet, legs, arms, chest, and head. Instead of Works being the stepping stone into Office, it became the bastard child that nobody liked and that got blamed for everything.
Works was perfectly compatible with Office. Office was completely incompatible with Works.
RE[3]: works just... works
by Bobthearch on Sat 10th Oct 2009 02:56
in reply to "RE[2]: works just... works"
I didn't mean to say it was primarily Works at fault, just that the two didn't always play well together. With most businesses and schools using Office, the lack of Office compatibility was a major problem for Works users.
Besides, I recall file compatibility being a two-way problem: opening Works files in Office, and Office files in Works.
RE[2]: works just... works
by gustl on Sun 11th Oct 2009 17:55
in reply to "RE: works just... works"






Member since:
2006-01-27
I never minded using Works, simple and fast, but the incompatibility between Works and standard Office files prevented it from actually being useful.