Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 8th Oct 2009 22:04 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 388466
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I've used Open Office quite a bit, both on Linux and Windows. Features are impressive, but it just doesn't feel as 'snappy' as Office 2000.
OpenOffice has improved a great deal speed-wise in recent versions.
Vista and Windows 7 both use a feature called "Prefetch" or "Superfetch" which pre-loads oft-used software. This can considerably reduce the start-up time.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prefetcher
To get the same functionality in Linux, install the daemon called "preload".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preload_(software)
Start-up time of applications is most often what people are judging when they speak of "snappiness".
In general use, after startup, the OpenOffice.org and Microsoft Office programs will be equally as responsive, depending on the resources used by other applications and the underlying OS. In general, Vista is quite noticeably slower on the same hardware than any version of Linux.
Compared to Linux machines, Windows machines quite often have extra processing overhead such as background virus scanning, or multiple different update monitors, to perform.






Member since:
2006-01-27
I've used Open Office quite a bit, both on Linux and Windows. Features are impressive, but it just doesn't feel as 'snappy' as Office 2000.