Linked by snydeq on Mon 12th Oct 2009 15:24 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 388884
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-11-27
Speaking of steeling ideas...
I was thinking about what examples Apple provides for anti-software-patent campaigns. Before they adopted FreeBSD, did they have patents on their previous low-level system?
If they did, then it's an example of parallel efforts, one copyright based and one patent based, with the patent based effort finally admitting that the copyright based effort had produced much better software.
If anyone knows of the patent status of Apple's previous low level software, that'd be very useful. Thanks.
http://en.swpat.org/wiki/Bilski_3#Innovation_without_patents:_Apple...