Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 12th Oct 2009 18:25 UTC

Thread beginning with comment 388956
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Yes, but Mr Nimmer was handled very roughly by the judge in the Autodesk case. Not only his opinions as such, but his standing also. A very dry sense of humor there, and Mr Nimmer must be smarting a little from it. Reliance on Mr Nimmer has become a little less secure following that.
Member since:
2005-07-06
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/misinterpreting-copyright.html
And lets look at Mr. Stallman's CV ...
Nope, no JD there. Now, let's here from Raymond Nimmer
Distinguished Chair in Residence, UCP
and
Who says in his declaration in Vernor v Autodesk (http://www.groklaw.net/pdf/Autodesk-52.pdf)
So Thom, let's see an article (hell, a comment would do) showing why Nimmer's analysis is incorrect. Maybe site an authority who actually has a JD while you're at it.