Linked by Eugenia Loli on Thu 15th Oct 2009 20:18 UTC
Google "There are countless pundits and other tech gurus describing Google Wave as a disappointment, lately. Most of that seems to come from the fact that nobody seems to get what Wave is for. So they compare it to social media. Is Wave the next Twitter? Nope. Is it the next Facebook? Nope. Is it going to replace Instant Messengers? Possibly, in some circumstances, but not any time soon." Read more here.
Thread beginning with comment 389484
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Comment by Beachchairs
by MattV on Thu 15th Oct 2009 23:30 UTC in reply to "Comment by Beachchairs"
Member since:

Unfortunately, this description has never been helpful. Wave doesn't replace email for all the various things that email is currently used for.

What this post clarifies, is that Wave does provide a superior replacement for 'email + shared document repository', for groups of people collaborating on document creation.

This isn't such a problem for programmers, where the email conversation is managed along with a shared version control system. It is a significant problem in the corporate world, however, where groups must work together to produce documents without the assistance of the VCS, and more of the history and contextual information must be borne by the email conversation.

Reply Parent Score: 2