Linked by David Adams on Thu 15th Oct 2009 18:00 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 389517
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Theo de Raadt would be good
by sbenitezb on Fri 16th Oct 2009 03:20
in reply to "RE[5]: Theo de Raadt would be good"
RE[7]: Theo de Raadt would be good
by Moulinneuf on Fri 16th Oct 2009 03:29
in reply to "RE[6]: Theo de Raadt would be good"





Member since:
2005-07-06
I use my real name, so it's not like I am the one hidding here, you don't see 0.00000001% of what I post and I am amongst the top thousand contributor of news story on OsNews,
http://www.osnews.com/user/Moulinneuf/
http://www.osnews.com/user/uid:266/comments
http://www.osnews.com/user/uid:266/submissions
BTW submnission is what got published , not what I submited.
No , they review it.
No I mean an insecure OS nobody in the security industry use and no secure hardware maker support by default. The fact you constrain it to server only is showing of the real problem.
Sure, but it as nothing to do with BSD and their finance ...
Actually, we can draw a direct paralel with linus Torvald who worked at a company who was not directly related to GNU/Linux , but using the Linux Kernel and GNU/Linux and himself to a certain degree where right, the GNU/Linux industry grew.
Time already proved he was wrong.
No Because he is wrong and that is what make him an Ass to other who are right and disagree with him. Being an ass don't prove him as right the state of BSD does prove him as wrong.
Actually if the dev are in charge of distribution that is a big problem in itself ...
Every single possible way.
Yes, no one can put a license on someone else code.
Absolutly nothing.
Your talking about the three mainstream OS and there paid working people and corporation and industry as if any BSD had anything close or resembling it.
I am not a moron. You should look up the definition, it does not mean someone more inteligent then you , that you disagree with.
No , he never did. He said had BSD been legal and not in court for stealing UNIX at the tme, he would have chosend BSD over the GPL. But hey you must have a link to back up your quote, I could be wrong about that and you could show me soemthing real for a change.
BSD make bad code, everyone else innovate over time.
Don't try and suggest you understand something.
Not discussing the world, just "Theo de Raadt".
No , I keep searching and there is nothing Theo De Raadt proved or that was right. He adopted others theory after bashing them at first ...
Nope ...
Too poor , too stupid , too incompetent and too clueless ... Or you believe yourself to be able to judge all book on it's merit, without having read most of them.
That's another thing, BSD distribution was done with books, most of them are not carried anywhere, even in specialised vendor catalog or they have very old copies.
Edited 2009-10-16 01:59 UTC