Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 17th Oct 2009 12:45 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 389796
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: The question then is...
by Thom_Holwerda on Sat 17th Oct 2009 13:58
in reply to "RE: The question then is..."
RE[3]: The question then is...
by kragil on Sat 17th Oct 2009 16:06
in reply to "RE[2]: The question then is..."
RE[3]: The question then is...
by sbenitezb on Sun 18th Oct 2009 00:35
in reply to "RE[2]: The question then is..."
RE[2]: The question then is...
by PlatformAgnostic on Sat 17th Oct 2009 16:36
in reply to "RE: The question then is..."
As far as I know (from talking with people who work on MSE several years ago), it's one of the few AV systems that does not use non-public APIs or unsupported hooking.
Most Microsoft software that ships outside of Windows does not use internal Windows APIs. There are tools that are run during the build process which enforce this restriction.
RE[2]: The question then is...
by AdamW on Sat 17th Oct 2009 18:07
in reply to "RE: The question then is..."
RE[3]: The question then is...
by Phloptical on Sun 18th Oct 2009 19:41
in reply to "RE[2]: The question then is..."
"They can drill down to the lowest common denominator using programming calls, and functions that are hidden from the rest of the world."
That's sort of exactly what he was saying was the problem.
That's sort of exactly what he was saying was the problem.
And my point was basically, "Yeah, so?" How is that a problem? I would expect them to release enough information for devs to code apps to work efficiently with the OS, and that's it. Maybe the AV companies get a little more, due to what they're end goal is, but at the end of the day, MS is protecting their investment.






Member since:
2006-10-10
...if Microsoft can create a package that small which uses that few resources why can't the others? A skeptic may think that Microsoft is somehow holding back information that would allow these companies to create something as small that uses as few resources. "
It's Microsoft's OS, that's why. They had better be able to create the best, most accurate AV out there because they have the access to all the source. They can drill down to the lowest common denominator using programming calls, and functions that are hidden from the rest of the world.
Personally, I want MS to succeed at this. It's their holes, they should be the ones to fix them.