Linked by Kroc Camen on Sat 17th Oct 2009 05:27 UTC
Microsoft Whilst it's not okay in Microsoft's eyes for Google to install a plugin into Internet Explorer, increasing the potential surface area of attack, when Microsoft do it to Firefox, it's a different matter. Now a security hole has been found in a plugin that Microsoft have been silently installing into Firefox.
Thread beginning with comment 389831
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: beware the .net
by robojerk on Sat 17th Oct 2009 18:01 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: beware the .net"
robojerk
Member since:
2006-01-10

I'm still waiting for my invite to Google Wave.

Google claims their rationale to Chrome Frame for IE8 is to get their JavaScript engine in IE so Wave will run better. Is Wave slow for you because of IE javascript engine or just slow in general?

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[4]: beware the .net
by Hiev on Sat 17th Oct 2009 18:06 in reply to "RE[3]: beware the .net"
Hiev Member since:
2005-09-27

IE8 doesn't support wave well, and wave in chrome is slow and CPU hungry.

oh and please, stop the fallacity that a faster JS makes a lot of difference when loading a webpage, JS loading only represents 15% to 20% of the loading time of a webpage.

Edited 2009-10-17 18:14 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2