Linked by Kaj de Vos on Sun 18th Oct 2009 21:07 UTC
Syllable, AtheOS Several long-term development goals are starting to come together for the Syllable project. At a request from Carl Sassenrath, inventor of REBOL and chief architect of the Amiga OS, Kaj de Vos has created a website that allows you to try the REBOL programming language without installing it. The site showcases the new REBOL version 3. It also offers to test the classic REBOL 2 and ORCA, the open source implementation of REBOL, and to make comparisons between them.
Thread beginning with comment 390011
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Why Rebol?
by henrikmk on Mon 19th Oct 2009 12:07 UTC in reply to "Why Rebol?"
Member since:

It's hard to say in a few words, because REBOL is incredibly broadly scoped and is a very deep language. It's not a language that you would place in a particular location in a system, such as we have with HTML/JS/CSS/PHP/MySQL.

Rather it's a language that covers the whole thing from db storage to serving to networking to presentation.

Its second feature is that REBOL scripts are very small. Yesterday I wrote a time tracker with a GUI for my job. It took two hours to write and is 3307 bytes. Today I'm writing a GUI based CSV import wizard that is just around 11 kb now.

REBOL 2 has 54 datatypes, REBOL 3 has 56. This forms the foundation for its extreme expressibility to let you create dialects (subdomain languages), like:

[buy 1000$ of shares in aapl at 180 only tomorrow]

That's valid REBOL data using the word! money! and integer! datatypes. It's wrapped in a block! datatype, the square brackets.

In REBOL, data is code and code is data. You can model and form your data like silly putty and then execute it or treat it as a dialect.

REBOL 2 is a single executable at around 6-700 kb which contains GUI, networking, full interpreter, console, desktop. It takes about 2 seconds to install (if you want to). REBOL 3 is even smaller, but it's still under development.

There are more things to list, but I'll stop here.

Reply Parent Score: 6

RE[2]: Why Rebol?
by merkoth on Mon 19th Oct 2009 13:04 in reply to "RE: Why Rebol?"
merkoth Member since:

Oh, very nice summary of the language. Thanks ;)

Reply Parent Score: 4