Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 19th Oct 2009 12:06 UTC, submitted by ebasconp
Thread beginning with comment 390029
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Personally, I'd rather see that the situation was changed. Originally, it was destined to be a page II story, until a thoughtful reader, joku, provided more details; thus the story could be listed on Page I.
I prefer this method of notification, vs. history getting edited and thrown away. From now on, when you see underlined text, pretend it's not there.
I prefer this method of notification, vs. history getting edited and thrown away. From now on, when you see underlined text, pretend it's not there.
Agreed.
Unfortunately everyone has their own opinion on how something should be done and sometimes there is no "correct" method, only preferred approaches.
In this instance though, I completely agree with yourself (and Thom)
RE[2]: Comment by SJ87
by Mark Williamson on Tue 20th Oct 2009 13:02
in reply to "RE: Comment by SJ87"




Member since:
2005-07-06
Personally, I'd rather see that the situation was changed. Originally, it was destined to be a page II story, until a thoughtful reader, joku, provided more details; thus the story could be listed on Page I.
I prefer this method of notification, vs. history getting edited and thrown away. From now on, when you see underlined text, pretend it's not there.