Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 22nd Oct 2009 15:17 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 390448
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Comment by bralkein
by CaptainN- on Thu 22nd Oct 2009 19:45
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by bralkein"
Has there ever been any version of any patent system that didn't benefit the already wealthy? I think the problem with patents is they seem like a good idea in the abstract. After centuries of trying that system out, when do we get to admit patents don't benefit individual innovators?






Member since:
2006-12-20
Oh yeah, well I would definitely agree that there are some massive problems with the patent system as it stands. Even many present-day inventors (Trevor Baylis, James Dyson) say they dislike it, because it favours the large corporations. However, I do support the idea of patents for genuinely good inventions and I just think that the system needs to be fixed to better filter out laughable "inventions" of the 1-click calibre and to make it cheaper and easier for small businesses and individual inventors to file patents in a way that allows them to compete with the big boys.
Having said all of this, just because Nokia is taking someone to court over some patents it doesn't necessarily mean that those patents are stupid. Nokia does spend a lot of money on research and maybe they did come up with some great ideas, on which they deserve a bit of limited-time protection! Also they're not just attacking some small-time guys, they're going after Apple, who could certainly afford to licence patents if everyone else can. Anyway, it's not as if Apple doesn't benefit from IP laws themselves.