Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 22nd Oct 2009 21:53 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 390543
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-13
Being critical is one thing, and is by all means not only acceptable but necessary. But your not just being critical, you are insisting everyone is wrong but you. That’s not having an opinion and presenting it, that’s suppression of everyone else’s. I agree with some of your points (I too think that 2003 was the god of OS’s, 2003 R2 ultimate 32 bit has been my desktop OS for a long time), but opinions are just that. It’s not a distinct science where scientific method rules out another educated guess by trial, error, and proof; to say that windows 7 (example) is not worth the upgrade and is not worth paying for is not based on fact and therefore people who think it isn’t are no more correct than those who think it is. Case and point, no one is wrong OR right, it’s all just words…
Edited 2009-10-22 23:26 UTC