Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 22nd Oct 2009 21:53 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 390560
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: What features?
by PlatformAgnostic on Fri 23rd Oct 2009 06:51
in reply to "RE[2]: What features?"
Um, the team that built the ribbon based its design on telemetry data of which features people actually use. People in the real world definitely do use more than the five features you listed. If you think the discoverability of features in Word is bad for typical users, how do you think they'd cope with the comparative brick wall that is a compiled document format?
And idiots keep saying something like LaTeX is too hard to learn.
The Troff I learnt 15 years ago still works today, and well into the future. The ~6 week learning curve that just keeps on giving
There is just no incentive, commericial or otherwise, to go fiddling with something that works so well.
Unlike a certain bundle of popular office applications.




Member since:
2005-07-22
An ever changing UI is hardly a way to optimally use a program. They screwed it because they need to put as much "features" as possible with each release to keep selling their shit. True is 99% of people don't ever user more than Bold, Save as, Underline, Change Typography, Align, and a couple of other expected features. I don't think a program should have so much features, it makes it very difficult to learn/master. Don't even mention having to relearn how to use a damn word processor with each new release.
And idiots keep saying something like LaTeX is too hard to learn.