Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 22nd Oct 2009 21:53 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 390610
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
It's because their success isn't attributed to being a superior offering, rather it's something plagued by endless bugs and it's only the established monopoly that kept them going. Comes as no surprise that they don't know where to go next, they never had original ideas in the first place.
The flip side is that removing or moving all backwards compatibility is a monumental task that won't give any benefits given the sheer diversity of software people tend to use and how much of that software likes to tie itself so deep into the OS...
It's because their success isn't attributed to being a superior offering, rather it's something plagued by endless bugs and it's only the established monopoly that kept them going. Comes as no surprise that they don't know where to go next, they never had original ideas in the first place.
Many people don't want original ideas, they just want their computer to work. I'd sooner see Microsoft focus their energies on producing better middleware - maybe even provide a Silverlight development suite for Mac so that Flash can finally be killed off for the useless bloatware and browser-hangware that it is.
The flip side is that removing or moving all backwards compatibility is a monumental task that won't give any benefits given the sheer diversity of software people tend to use and how much of that software likes to tie itself so deep into the OS...
Why? all the hardware has already been moved to the new driver models - it is just a matter of removing the backwards compatibility that exists. The list of known safe win32 calls and deprecated parts have been known for many years - it would be a matter of simply removing those and providing a free copy of Windows XP in the form of an image and be done with it.
Edited 2009-10-23 14:44 UTC




Member since:
2005-07-06
The ads are great; focused and not too much fluff. Real people using Microsoft products in the real world and using them in real world scenarios. The down side is, however, the product itself is horrible and this will come back and bite them if it doesn't address the fundamental flaws of Windows.
They have the virtualisation software, why don't the fundamentally throw huge amounts of Windows out the Window and virtualise what is required for backwards compatibility? But this is the same company whose programmers have been indoctrinated with this stupid idea of 'legacy code is an asset" - no it isn't. It is no more of an asset than a rusting car sitting out the front of the house on concrete blocks - it's an eye sore that needs to be purged.
Windows can be a great operating system, it is the poor management that don't allow the talent to shine - management lacking in creativity but up to their eye balls in MBA (Master of Bugger All) but no practical touch with reality and making the tough decisions.