Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 22nd Oct 2009 21:53 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 390765
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-03-05
It is called brevity as another poster has pointed out. The links were redundant and people can go to the original post to click on them if need be.
You also have a comprehension issue when I specifically posted that the cost to migrate for home users would typically be the price of a OEM copy of Win 7. It damned sure is not the $1000 to $2000 you keep citing and even those figures for businesses is questionable when you don't include the savings that Win 7 can provide in better power management and default security over 2000/XP.
I stand by my statement on The Inquirer as they like to cherry pick studies like these to always present Windows in a bad light. They are hardly legitimate news.
Edited 2009-10-23 23:32 UTC