Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 25th Oct 2009 12:51 UTC
Editorial A couple of years ago, a professor at my university had a very interesting thought exchange with the class I was in. We were a small group, and I knew most of them, they were my friends. Anyway, we had a talk about language purism - not an unimportant subject if you study English in The Netherlands.
Thread beginning with comment 391032
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
wirespot
Member since:
2006-06-21

The relative merits of Apple OS and hardware versus other software and hardware is course totally irrelevant to the legal issues.


Yes, OSNews is just a big old attorney and paralegal community interested in this case only from a purely intellectual and professional point of view. The merits of Apple products or personal likes and dislikes play no role whatsoever in this. And Thom keeps writing opinion pieces on the case because he's a paralegal in training to become a lawyer specializing in copyright.

No fanboys or ignorant people here, move along.

Edited 2009-10-25 22:46 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 4

BallmerKnowsBest Member since:
2008-06-02

And Thom keeps writing opinion pieces on the case because he's a paralegal in training to become a lawyer specializing in copyright.


If Thom's articles on Apple are a bit contrarian, the funny thing is that it's probably a reaction to shrill fanbois like you who go ballistic if you think someone has blasphemed against holy mother Apple.

No fanboys or ignorant people here, move along.


Pot. Kettle. Black.

Reply Parent Score: 2

boldingd Member since:
2009-02-19

I am not an Apple fanboy; I am an Apple hater. And I have repeatedly tried to point out the serious flaws in Thom's legal arguments. Pointing out the huge flaws in his reasoning is definitely, definitely not the exclusive purview of Apple Fanboys. And you're not the first person to falsely claim that it is.

Reply Parent Score: 2