Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 25th Oct 2009 12:51 UTC
Editorial A couple of years ago, a professor at my university had a very interesting thought exchange with the class I was in. We were a small group, and I knew most of them, they were my friends. Anyway, we had a talk about language purism - not an unimportant subject if you study English in The Netherlands.
Thread beginning with comment 391168
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: About pystar/apple
by twitterfire on Mon 26th Oct 2009 15:54 UTC in reply to "About pystar/apple"
Member since:

A good analogy and a decent opinion piece. I like osx its a great product but i could care less about apples hardware or their business practices in general. I think apple has the opposite problem of microsoft, apple has no confidence in a great product (osx) microsoft has too much confidence (arrogance)in their products.

Microsoft has a large user base. Microsoft has the largest pool of commercial applications. Microsoft has a stong position in the market. And of course, there is a lack of competition. I'm sure that if someone cames up with a better desktop os, MS will feel challenged. But that's not the case with neither os x nor linux.

Getting a bsd system and ruining it's strongest points and throwing on top of it a handicapped file system and a shiny UI does not make an os better.

I'm not saying that Windows is very good and I'm not an MS fan. But right now, we don't have a better choice for desktops and for workstations. For server, we can use eiher linux or BSD. But for desktops we are stuck with windows for good.

Reply Parent Score: 1