Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 26th Oct 2009 19:28 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Thread beginning with comment 391233
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
You're talking as if it's absurdly difficult to make something GPL compatible. The MS-Samba deal is a good example of a deal done right.
Microsoft have plenty of legal power and could have made a clearer agreement if they had wished. I'm not saying that they are doing this on purpose, but it does raise eyebrows when they claim that this can be used by everyone when it probably can't be used in software released under the most prevalent open source licences.







Member since:
2005-09-27
But tell me, what is compatible with GPL and their license? just BSD and other GPL like licenses. Is hard to please them.
But the opennes of this file format is not a try to please anyone anyway.