Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 27th Oct 2009 00:37 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 391234
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-08-19
It's not specifically computers affecting the language, as keyboards, since I assume the same factors would apply just as much to an old 1930's typewriter as to a modern laptop.
It comes down to practicality - you can only have so many keys on a keyboard, and so you have to simplify. Separate keys for open and close quotes, single and double? Nice, but not strictly necessary - little readability is lost by merging the two symbols. And the same argument elsewhere. Another example for you is a tendency to drop accents from characters, as they're hard to enter on a standard US keyboard...
Interestingly, computers actually improve the matter a little, as they can be a bit smarter about things - automatically turning straight quotes into their curly counterparts, allowing combination keystrokes to enter accented characters, etc.