Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 27th Oct 2009 00:37 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 391415
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
I've looked at the previous subject and not that many comments were about language purity but apparently it's a subject you like..
I live in France so I've heard too many times about language purity debates..
I find them quite annoying in fact: language evolves in time, not so long ago people didn't go very much to school so it was really true evolution, why should we block language evolution now??
Because we have 'language tzars' who want to prove that they are important by managing language evolution and polititians who take an easy ride with nationalists by managing language 'purity'??
In an historical context it doesn't make sense.