Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 27th Oct 2009 00:37 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 391480
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Comment by kaiwai
by JacobMunoz on Tue 27th Oct 2009 22:16
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by kaiwai"




Member since:
2006-03-18
Well, I would have to disagree. Having genders, plurality, politeness, tenses, etc in language enriches it and lets us communicate in a richer way. Language represents human communication, so it's no surprise that it contains very human concepts in its grammar, such as gender.
A language containing grammatical gender has nothing to do with a piece of literature in that language being demeaning to either men or to women. Such a piece of literature can also be written in a language in which gender is less ingrained into the grammar. In other words, sexism != grammatical gender.