Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 27th Oct 2009 15:23 UTC, submitted by diegocg
Thread beginning with comment 391646
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-02-19
And if you absolutely have to have all hardware features supported, you're best off running Windows, as a general rule.
Fair enough.
There are many good reasons for running FOSS drivers. But I've always found the whole "at the mercy of" argument to be a bit contrived. In general, I've found proprietary drivers to be more feature complete than the FOSS ones.
In my lesser experience, the closed/binary drivers usually have better 3D accelaration... and next-to-nothing else. Things like xrandr are usually better supported or only supported in the open drivers. I think that's the case with kernel-based mode setting even now: if either nVidia or ATI's binary drivers support Kernel mode-setting, it's news to me.
Now, whose fault that is is a completely separate question.