Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 28th Oct 2009 14:09 UTC, submitted by Cytor
Thread beginning with comment 391703
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Is this really noncompliance?
by tomcat on Thu 29th Oct 2009 16:53
in reply to "RE[3]: Is this really noncompliance?"
RE[5]: Is this really noncompliance?
by StephenBeDoper on Thu 29th Oct 2009 17:10
in reply to "RE[4]: Is this really noncompliance?"
That proposition has never made sense. Why would Microsoft want to increase competition within the x86/x64 operating system market?
Perhaps Microsoft has been secretly taken over by the Robot Devil from Futurama.
"Ah-ha-ha, my ridiculously-circuitous plan is now one-quarter complete!"





Member since:
2005-07-06
It's no less plausible than the idea that Microsoft is secretly behind Psystar, as part of a sinister plot to undermine the GPL.