Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 28th Oct 2009 23:20 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 391732
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Not about BS patents
by JeffS on Thu 29th Oct 2009 15:52
in reply to "RE[2]: Not about BS patents"






Member since:
2006-12-28
I like to agree with you but I'm afraid that the following...
...taken from [link]http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p... || this patent[/link] does not bode well of your assertion.
Frankly, I'm all in favour of hardware patents but in this case I'll reserve judgement until I have the full story. If Nokia are talking about purely interoperability patents then I'll be siding with Apple, loathed as I am to do any such thing.
Apple was shouting about how they patented the crap out of the iPhone. I guess what goes around comes around.
Edit: Bloody OSNews none standard link! ;-p
Edited 2009-10-29 08:50 UTC