Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 29th Oct 2009 15:39 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 392040
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: 9.04 broke working sound hardware as well
by sbergman27 on Fri 30th Oct 2009 20:58
in reply to "RE[2]: 9.04 broke working sound hardware as well"
Yeah, Ubuntu ships PulseAudio
In general, Ubuntu has worked substantially better for my users, and for me, than Fedora ever did. Emprically speaking, that much is pretty definite. It's the tendrils shooting out of the Fedora camp to poison other distros which take me aback. And yes, I do blame the Ubuntu devs for falling for the hype. Ubuntu should not be using such alpha software as Pulseaudio. Red Hat's perpetual pre-alpha distro is threatening to take the rest of Linux down with it. And I think it's about time that the community started turning a more suspicious and pragmatic eye upon projects coming from under the Fedora canopy.
Some are OK. Others are quite poisonous.
Edited 2009-10-30 21:06 UTC
RE[4]: 9.04 broke working sound hardware as well
by Rahul on Fri 30th Oct 2009 21:14
in reply to "RE[3]: 9.04 broke working sound hardware as well"
Other distributions continue to include a hell lot of software that Red Hat develops because they find it useful. You know, things like NetworkManager or system-config-printer.
If you don't like that point your fingers at Ubuntu for what Ubuntu ships. It's not like they are muppets who cannot make their own decisions and would fall for mere hype. Trolling about Fedora for what Ubuntu includes and with broken patches is ridiculous.







Member since:
2005-07-06
"This particular cancer does come from Fedora. Let's place the origin where it really belongs"
Yeah, Ubuntu ships PulseAudio with broken patches and let's blame Fedora for that. How nice
http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/pa-in-ubuntu.html