Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 2nd Nov 2009 18:08 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Mac OS X Anyone who hangs around on websites with information about installing Mac OS X on non-Apple labelled computers has probably already encountered this report, but it's newsworthy anyway. The upcoming release of Mac OS X 10.6.2 will remove support for the Intel Atom line of processors from Mac OS X.
Thread beginning with comment 392312
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Comment by haus
by ari-free on Mon 2nd Nov 2009 20:43 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by haus"
ari-free
Member since:
2007-01-22

"Right now, I could buy a copy of OSX, come home to my nice computer, and in the process of installing it, find out that they arbitrarily decided to forbid me from installing it on certain of my computers."

they most certainly can. You don't have a right to software that will always work with the hardware it used to work with.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[5]: Comment by haus
by fretinator on Mon 2nd Nov 2009 21:13 in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by haus"
fretinator Member since:
2005-07-06

You don't have a right to software that will always work with the hardware it used to work with.

That is so dishonest, it must have hurt to write it. Nobody is saying that the software has to work with my computer. If it doesn't, I'm out of luck. The question is - can they forbid me from even trying it. Even in an "Emperor Steve has such beautiful clothes" world, you must admit is somewhat strange to forbid people from using Apple software on machines the user owns. Very strange.

By the way, I do not have an Apple, I do not have OSX, and I am not trying to run it on my machines. I just find it wierd in a "free" society that people could support such a tyrannical concept.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

RE[6]: Comment by haus
by Hiev on Mon 2nd Nov 2009 21:20 in reply to "RE[5]: Comment by haus"
Hiev Member since:
2005-09-27

You are free to disagree and don't buy their products, there is where liberty lies.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[5]: Comment by haus
by sbergman27 on Mon 2nd Nov 2009 21:34 in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by haus"
sbergman27 Member since:
2005-07-24

You don't have a right to software that will always work with the hardware it used to work with.


What, exactly, is involved in providing support for a processor which supports all the x86 instructions that their supported hardware products do? Doesn't it come down to selectively breaking it?

How come when it comes to what big corporations do, we always hear about what "it" has the "right" to do.

(And exactly what is "it", anyway? A virtual person? Some bizarre legal entity masquerading as a person? Something else? What rights, exactly, should "it" have?)

But when it comes to what the users do, we hear so much about how we don't have a right to... whatever.

And when it comes to "rights"... how many of you folks have a department of attorneys on retainer to fight for yours? Because Apple ("it") sure has one. And is not afraid to use it. Though it does tend to send in its PR department first, as the actual deliverers of the legal threat:

http://www.osnews.com/story/21937/Apple_Tried_to_Silence_Exploding_...

Edited 2009-11-02 21:44 UTC

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3