Linked by Pobrecito Hablador on Mon 2nd Nov 2009 21:19 UTC
Sun Solaris, OpenSolaris One of the advantages of ZFS is that it doesn't need a fsck. Replication, self-healing and scrubbing are a much better alternative. After a few years of ZFS life, can we say it was the correct decision? The reports in the mailing list are a good indicator of what happens in the real world, and it appears that once again, reality beats theory. The author of the article analyzes the implications of not having a fsck tool and tries to explain why he thinks Sun will add one at some point.
Thread beginning with comment 392350
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: ZFS Is a rock solid.
by Lennie on Mon 2nd Nov 2009 23:18 UTC in reply to "ZFS Is a rock solid."
Lennie
Member since:
2007-09-22

Just an observation, I think 24/7 means no powerloss. ;-)

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[2]: ZFS Is a rock solid.
by tylerdurden on Tue 3rd Nov 2009 08:24 in reply to "RE: ZFS Is a rock solid."
tylerdurden Member since:
2009-03-17

24/7 usually means they don't turn them off.

Reply Parent Score: 2