Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 2nd Nov 2009 18:08 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Thread beginning with comment 392360
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-08-01
Some of us still didn't get it yet. Apple never wanted OSX to be "OS for x86 hardware", instead of "OS for Apple Mac hardware". I mean, I can't even install Leo or SnowLeo on my fairly new AMD machines without a lot of hacking, which returns a massive butthurt in any way I can't use this with all the native Mac experience. What is the point then?
Some of us waited incredible anxiously for Apple to "release" Mac OS X for all the x86-universe. But hey, Apple is clear to crystal about it - people still buying Macs! Otherwise I see Be Inc. scenario with many crappy drivers and etc, etc, etc. This one not ended up very well.