Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 2nd Nov 2009 23:59 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 392455
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Windows market share
by lemur2 on Tue 3rd Nov 2009 09:43
in reply to "RE[3]: Windows market share"
My text:
Ubuntu/Kubuntu comes with vastly more and significantly better quality desktop software
Your counterclaim:
Software available for desktop Linux comes nowhere near to what is available for Windows and OS X.
Mismatch.
Windows 7 comes with no desktop Office suite to speak of. It has no spreadsheet, and a poxy word-processing applet called Wordpad.
http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/window-on-windows/?p=930
Whoop de doo. Oh, and BTW the anaemic text editor applet is broken on Windows 7. How does one break a text editor applet (especially one as basic as Notepad)?
I've been using all three for a few years and there is no way I or anyone I know could fully switch to Linux.
Your opinion. Millions of people would claim otherwise. For example, if you were to purchase the expensive but ubiquitous proprietary Office suite additional aftermarket software for Windows 7, you would still find that you were lacking workable support for Opendocument format, which is the only viable cross-platform-capable Office suite format. OpenOffice.org 3.1.1, which comes with Kubuntu/Ubuntu at no cost, and which has about 25% of the installed base of Office suites, is arguably a better Office suite than the expensive aftermarket MS Office add-on for Windows 7.
There is no set of applications, for any platform, that will fully suit all use cases.
99% of the people agree
Nope. 90% of the people have never heard of Linux, or at least have never tried it. 0.0001% of the people are very determined to try to keep it that way, and they show up reliably on threads such as this.
Edited 2009-11-03 10:01 UTC
RE[5]: Windows market share
by lemur2 on Tue 3rd Nov 2009 10:07
in reply to "RE[4]: Windows market share"
OpenOffice.org 3.1.1, which comes with Kubuntu/Ubuntu at no cost, and which has about 25% of the installed base of Office suites, is arguably a better Office suite than the expensive aftermarket MS Office add-on for Windows 7.
Here is a quick summary of why this is so, for people who would desperately try to that claim this is not so:
http://why.openoffice.org/index.html
http://why.openoffice.org/why_great.html
http://why.openoffice.org/why_easy.html
http://why.openoffice.org/why_free.html
Remember, we are comparing this to Wordpad, Paint and Calc.
As I said, Kubuntu/Ubuntu comes with vastly more and better quality desktop software than Windows 7.
QED.
http://why.openoffice.org/why_sme.html
http://why.openoffice.org/why_gov.html
http://why.openoffice.org/why_edu.html
http://why.openoffice.org/why_nfp.html
http://why.openoffice.org/why_oem.html
Aw, heck, why not:
http://why.openoffice.org/why_foss.html
Edited 2009-11-03 10:25 UTC
RE[5]: Windows market share
by pandronic on Tue 3rd Nov 2009 21:25
in reply to "RE[4]: Windows market share"
First of all ... it is irrelevant what software is installed along with the OS and second OpenOffice runs under Windows too, and indeed it is a worthy alternative of MS Office (I, personally, use it exclusively for the past 3-4 years).
In fact almost all the good open source application run under Windows. Can you say the same about all the good proprietary applications running under Linux?






Member since:
2006-05-18
In what reality?
Software available for desktop Linux comes nowhere near to what is available for Windows and OS X. I've been using all three for a few years and there is no way I or anyone I know could fully switch to Linux. 99% of the people agree