Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 2nd Nov 2009 23:59 UTC
Windows Windows 7 has been out and about for little over a week now, and as it turns out, Microsoft's new baby is doing relatively well. That is, according to the figures by NetApplications: Windows 7 already reached the 3% mark this weekend, and is already closing in on the 4% mark.
Thread beginning with comment 392495
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Thom_Holwerda
Member since:
2005-06-29

Windows 7 hitting almost 4% and Linux stuck at 1%. Whoopee!!!! Counting the sales to OEM's doesn't count. And how exactly does NetApplications know how much Linux is really used out there??? There is not f**ken way of knowing, because there are no sales figures for Linux because it's FREE!


And punctuation died a little inside.

But anyway. NA does not use sales figures. They track a gazillion sites - from all walks of life - and have like millions and millions of hits from all over the world to deal with. It is about as accurate as these things can get.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

Soulbender Member since:
2005-08-18

They track a gazillion sites - from all walks of life - and have like millions and millions of hits from all over the world to deal with.


Don't beleive the hype. Gazillion eh?
Also, for these figures to be of any meaning whatsoever we need to know how the data was sampled, what the sample is and how the results was calculated.
Statistics for which you don't know, or can't find out, these values are meaningless.
I'm not saying they're wrong but if they won't tell you how they arrived at their conclusions it's pretty much worthless.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 4

siride Member since:
2006-01-02

Based on download stats from Ubuntu and Fedora and the like, desktop Linux users are likely in the millions, maybe 10s of millions. Not bad, but hardly a significant portion of the desktop market. Walk around anywhere with computers and you'll be hard-pressed to find Linux machines, or at least a significant number of them, unless you are in some specialized location like a Linux lab at a university.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

ggeldenhuys Member since:
2006-11-13

It is about as accurate as these things can get.


Really?? So if my web browser identification string does not show the OS, my count is invalid (or do they then simply assume Windows). If my browser identification string is "faked" so that some idiotic website can work and not block me, that count is incorrect as well.

Very accurate - NOT!

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

strcpy Member since:
2009-05-20


Really?? So if my web browser identification string does not show the OS, my count is invalid (or do they then simply assume Windows). If my browser identification string is "faked" so that some idiotic website can work and not block me, that count is incorrect as well.

Very accurate - NOT!


You should recap the elementary statistics a little.

With big enough sample, browsers that do not show identification are just white nose.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

archiesteel Member since:
2005-07-02

"It is about as accurate as these things can get."

...which is to say, not very much. :-)

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2