Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 2nd Nov 2009 23:59 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 392512
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Windows market share
by boldingd on Tue 3rd Nov 2009 17:44
in reply to "RE[5]: Windows market share"
And I can feed trolls.
I don't trust hibernation on any system. My Vista machine doesn't wake up correctly from hibernation -- something goes bad-wrong, the display is garbaged, and it doesn't respond to the keybaord or mouse. I also managed to kernel-panic OS X 10.2 by hibernating while playing music in iTunes (and I haven't used OS X much since then).
And it doesn't really matter -- at least, not for me. Almost all my system usage sessions are long enough that an extra, say 30 seconds to do a cold-boot versus resume from hibernation are pretty quickly swamped by the total usage time.
RE[6]: Windows market share
by archiesteel on Thu 5th Nov 2009 21:38
in reply to "RE[5]: Windows market share"
RE[7]: Windows market share
by tomcat on Fri 6th Nov 2009 04:12
in reply to "RE[6]: Windows market share"
Suspend and Hibernate both work without a hitch on my Dell Mini 10v.
They also work flawlessly on my older Compaq Presario, although I had to enable KMS.
They also work flawlessly on my older Compaq Presario, although I had to enable KMS.
Good for you because, in general, Suspend/Hibernate are a crap shoot under Ubuntu:
http://ubuntuforums.org/archive/index.php/t-1051664.html
http://www.mydellmini.com/forum/archive/index.php/f-18.html
Edited 2009-11-06 04:15 UTC







Member since:
2006-02-05
Boot speed only matters when you can't trust hibernation.
See? I can troll too!