Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 2nd Nov 2009 23:59 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 392685
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[8]: Windows market share
by tomcat on Wed 4th Nov 2009 03:39
in reply to "RE[7]: Windows market share"
Windows 7 vulnerable to 8 out of 10 viruses
http://www.sophos.com/blogs/chetw/g/2009/11/03/windows-7-vulnerable
http://www.sophos.com/blogs/chetw/g/2009/11/03/windows-7-vulnerable
Whoa, news flash: An antivirus vendor says that its product is still needed. Of course, what they fail to mention is whether the viruses they ran actually did any real damage to the machine. "Ran" doesn't mean "damaged".
You're quite a comedian. Just for more laughs, why don't you post some more propaganda from a Linux site to support your arguments. I'm shocked, shocked, shocked that they would think Linux is better.
Keep the comedy coming...
Edited 2009-11-04 03:41 UTC
RE[9]: Windows market share
by lemur2 on Wed 4th Nov 2009 04:13
in reply to "RE[8]: Windows market share"





Member since:
2007-02-17
Backup link:
Windows 7 vulnerable to 8 out of 10 viruses
http://www.sophos.com/blogs/chetw/g/2009/11/03/windows-7-vulnerable
Lesson learned? You still need to run anti-virus on Windows 7.
And if you still need to run anti-virus software, then your machine will be slower.
Edited 2009-11-03 23:04 UTC