Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 3rd Nov 2009 10:13 UTC
While the Apple v. Psystar case is currently on hold until the hearing regarding the motions for a summary judgement takes place (November 12) the Psystar v. Apple case (still with me?) is only just beginning. Psystar has amended its original complaint in this second lawsuit, asking the judge to order Apple to cease calling Psystar's business "illegal", claiming it hurts the clone maker financially.
Thread beginning with comment 392734
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: Not OSnews, PSnews
by Mellin on Thu 5th Nov 2009 02:58
in reply to "RE[6]: Not OSnews, PSnews"
Member since:2005-07-06
RE[7]: Not OSnews, PSnews
by mbpark on Thu 5th Nov 2009 14:55
in reply to "RE[6]: Not OSnews, PSnews"
Member since:2005-11-17
People were porting OS X to different hardware when it was on PPC. Remember MacOnLinux for PPC Linux?
I had 10.3.9 running on Debian on a PPC Linux box.
Also, do you remember PearPC? Same premise.
Although, this shows you how far you can take it:
http://www.lowendmac.info/w/images/0/08/68kPanther.pdf
Member since:
2008-06-24
Apple really should have stayed off of x86 if they wanted to avoid this. For the same reason people try to port Linux to every gadget that has a CPU, people will try to get OSX to install somewhere Apple doesn't want it to... simply for the challenge of it.