Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 3rd Nov 2009 20:44 UTC

Thread beginning with comment 392768
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: one of the key points - also
by jabbotts on Wed 4th Nov 2009 17:51
in reply to "one of the key points"
In the US, the Palm problem is this:
*Sprint commercial plays*
"I thought Palm went under. Huh."
...and then, you know, it's Sprint. Metro folks want AT&T (GSM, more good OS choices) or Verizon (don't care about GSM), and folks out in the tech boonies want Verizon. Those who use Sprint still have many other phone options, so then Palm has to have some way to sell on merit, and beat out the public images of other phones and OSes.
Edited 2009-11-05 13:56 UTC
Member since:
2006-01-06
Palm tried to copy apple's business model.
Normally it's best to fix your competitor's mistakes in several key areas, and to do something very uniquely different to set yourself apart.
And the bad press a couple months ago about their app store and "free" applications didn't help. Nor does the upcoming Android 2.0 help either.