Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 3rd Nov 2009 10:13 UTC
While the Apple v. Psystar case is currently on hold until the hearing regarding the motions for a summary judgement takes place (November 12) the Psystar v. Apple case (still with me?) is only just beginning. Psystar has amended its original complaint in this second lawsuit, asking the judge to order Apple to cease calling Psystar's business "illegal", claiming it hurts the clone maker financially.
Thread beginning with comment 392824
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[8]: Not OSnews, PSnews
by DrillSgt on Wed 4th Nov 2009 18:07
in reply to "RE[7]: Not OSnews, PSnews"
Member since:2005-12-02
Actually, in many cases, they just sued the owner of the computer without making any effort to determine if the computer is used by other people and if one of them could have done the actual uploading. And that's when they weren't trying to sue dead people, or hundreds of John Does en masse.
Very true.
If so, there's an extraordinarily easy work-around: Psystar could simply hold off installing OS X on a PC until after it's been purchased, which would let them argue that they're just acting on behalf of the customer. If it's legal for support techs to install software for customers, then there should be no problem with Psystar installing OS X on for their customers.
Or if that doesn't fly, they could just ship the hardware and the OS X DVD together, along with a printout of some basic installation instructions. The OS X install is so dumbed-down that a gerbil could probably manage it.
Or if that doesn't fly, they could just ship the hardware and the OS X DVD together, along with a printout of some basic installation instructions. The OS X install is so dumbed-down that a gerbil could probably manage it.
That is correct. In actuality, that is how the hackintosh maker in California is doing it. I forget the name.
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2008-06-02
Actually, in many cases, they just sued the owner of the computer without making any effort to determine if the computer is used by other people and if one of them could have done the actual uploading. And that's when they weren't trying to sue dead people, or hundreds of John Does en masse.
If so, there's an extraordinarily easy work-around: Psystar could simply hold off installing OS X on a PC until after it's been purchased, which would let them argue that they're just acting on behalf of the customer. If it's legal for support techs to install software for customers, then there should be no problem with Psystar installing OS X on for their customers.
Or if that doesn't fly, they could just ship the hardware and the OS X DVD together, along with a printout of some basic installation instructions. The OS X install is so dumbed-down that a gerbil could probably manage it.