Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 4th Nov 2009 16:48 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 392836
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Mmm... but it's true. The only innovation was to come from reiser4 forever. Btrfs is just Oracle attempt to bring ZFS-like FS to Linux kernel. Ext4 is Ext3++. The rest are domain specific FS. Too little innovation. But then, innovation is just a buzzword.
And Ext4 is based on Ext3 is based on Ext2 is based on UFS.
http://lwn.net/Articles/342892/
An informed outsider might consider BtrFS as just a ZFS clone, but if you look at the implementation it is a vastly different and more modern beast.






Member since:
2006-09-22
May I ask why is so? Or should I refrain from feeding the troll?