Linked by Pobrecito Hablador on Mon 2nd Nov 2009 21:19 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 393097
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by kernpanic
by Dryhte on Sat 7th Nov 2009 06:00
in reply to "RE: Comment by kernpanic"




Member since:
2008-03-15
It seems to me the transactional nature of ZFS, the checksums, the 'scrub' command and the recently added zpool recovery feature all negate the need for a fsck utility.