Linked by Kroc Camen on Thu 5th Nov 2009 21:05 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 393103
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
You know that Linux is actually more portable than NetBSD now, right? Or at least, has more ports... not going to comment on how easy it is (-:
If XP is your benchmark for consistency you have never seriously used a consistent OS.
BeOS gets a lot of nice things right. If only we could have that atop the HURD, or something with its design.
What make's Arch's package manager so superior?
...If XP is your benchmark for consistency you have never seriously used a consistent OS...
What a silly silly thing to say! How do you know what he has thought about? Oh! I know how! His views don't match your prejudices! Ah! He can't be serious can he?
Lets be a little more tolerant if we can.
Regards,
Peter





Member since:
2007-06-30
What do I want?
* The smoothness working of FreeBSD
* The simplicity of CRUX
* The strength of Slackware
* The consistency of Windows XP
* The internal design of BeOS
* The device driver support of Windows XP
* The elegance of Mint
* The community support of Ubuntu
* The package manager of Arch
* The security of OpenBSD
* The user interface of Mac OS X
* The portability of NetBSD
* The SMP performance of Linux
* The toolchain of GNU
All in one.