Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 5th Nov 2009 21:49 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 393253
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Looks to me - lshw
by darknexus on Fri 6th Nov 2009 17:24
in reply to "RE[2]: Looks to me - lshw"
Well, they'd at least need to develop a nicer interface than the CLI for most of their customers, I'd imagine. I don't know if lshw is available, but there are several other ways to get a system's entire specification in OS X. Build this into Rebel EFI with an option to send to Psystar or save the output, and that's all they'd need. Sometimes I wonder if Psystar is deliberately trying to look shady, or if they've just got more financial backing than common sense.
RE[4]: Looks to me - does seem like it
by jabbotts on Fri 6th Nov 2009 18:26
in reply to "RE[3]: Looks to me - lshw"





Member since:
2007-09-06
Why even have them develop some special tool; lshw must be easy to get a hold of and compile against darwin if it's not already in there. The Debian hardware checker works this way already. You run lshw with the command switch they list on the site then past the results into a large text box and out comes the results; supported, supported with driverXYZ or unsupported.