Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 7th Nov 2009 14:33 UTC, submitted by J!NX
Thread beginning with comment 393444
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
NT, OSX, and QNX say "what's up"
NT and OSX aren't microkernels. E.g. read http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?MicroKernel (yes, there are more authoritary links, but who has time for that?).
QNX might be, though.







Member since:
2008-12-26
Microkernel is necessarily slower than a monolithic kernel (unless the monolithic one is very badly done, of course).
OTOH, the cleaner architecture and modularity of microkernel affords for much faster development speed, as proven by hurd, minix and friends.