Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 8th Nov 2009 16:09 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 393565
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Been there, read that.
by elmimmo on Mon 9th Nov 2009 04:00
in reply to "RE: Been there, read that."
But I mean, there you have all the past one-line headlines waiting for you to click on the ones that make you tick. I see no point whatsoever.
They might be less irritating if they were marked with a different color or something to make them stand apart. That way I would not even lay my eyes on them. But I keep falling into reading the summary, and then noticing it is yet again one of those digests.
Edited 2009-11-09 04:03 UTC






Member since:
2006-12-05
I guess it might be good for anyone who doesn't read the sites every day, all week...
Then again, if I missed out on a full week of news, I'd rather just middle-click each interesting article one-by-one (to open in new tabs) and close them when done.
Maybe for people on mobile devices having all the summaries in one page could be good, but is that not what the main page pretty much is?
Edited 2009-11-09 03:29 UTC