Linked by Kroc Camen on Sun 8th Nov 2009 10:21 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 393585
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: You must not have to use your computer for much
by nt_jerkface on Tue 10th Nov 2009 01:29
in reply to "RE[2]: You must not have to use your computer for much"
Modded down for pointing out that "dir" (short for directory) is no less or more cryptic than "ls" (short for list structure)
You probably got modded down for plugging OpenOffice and Linux like you do in every story. We all know about OpenOffice and Linux. This is OSNEWS afterall.
As for ls it a lousy acronym where list would be a better choice. But even barring lousy two letter acronyms there are plenty of common Unix commands that have poor names and give no indication as to what they are used for like Grep, Sed, Awk, Emacs, Lpr/Lprm, and Vi to name a few. The fact that they chose 'man' instead of 'help' and didn't even bother creating an alias says enough. What else would someone try if they don't know what to do?
Unix is a silly handshakes club. It gets the job done yes but only after you learn all the silly handshakes.






Member since:
2007-02-17
Look at that!
Modded down for pointing out that "dir" (short for directory) is no less or more cryptic than "ls" (short for list structure), and that bash shell scripts are far, far more powerful and useful than NT/MSDOS batch files, and as a bonus the bash shell scripts are source-backwards-compatible with the industry standard predecessor OS.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ls
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/ls.html
Edited 2009-11-09 09:17 UTC