Linked by Kroc Camen on Mon 9th Nov 2009 14:20 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 393666
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-12-26
Wanted to single out this from the post:
I guess this is a somewhat typical, if subconscious, sentiment regarging firefox & chrome.
We all would want firefox to be this "successful" browser. The newcomers just didn't fight the battles Mozilla did, and are perhaps less "deserving" of the glory. The triumph of Chrome is a somewhat pyrhic victory, and using/advocating it just doesn't give you the same righteous satisfaction as using mozilla/ff did back in the day IE was still relevent. (Yes, a true geek *will* have moral undertones in their software preferences ;-).
Somewhat sadly, it seems it's Chromium that is bringing the engineering excellence to bear, and making the competition look silly. I suppose the one "moral" angle with Chromium is that the Linux versions seems to be a first-class citizen (it's even faster on X11 than on Windows, apparently). Yet, it loses on the account of "free web" extensions (noscript, greasemonkey, adblock, javascript version...), and just not being the community project FF is.