Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 9th Nov 2009 00:59 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 393680
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2007-02-17
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_atom#Architecture
Hmmm, I think I may have not thought this through properly.
When I first got a machine with an Atom CPU, I tried it with several liveCDs. They all went into a "kernel panic" and wouldn't boot. It wasn't until a few months later when the next round of Linux distribution releases occurred that suddenly all of the new liveCDs being released would boot.
Then came this article, with its observation that it was quite possible to produce an OS that would run on x86 but not Atom.
I just assumed that Atom must lack some normally-assumed CPU extensions, I suppose.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86#Extensions
But perhaps not. It is quite possible that all of the observations about x86 OSes not booting on Atom can be simply explained by a lack of drivers required by the kernel.
I've had Debian Etch, and Kubuntu 8.04/8.10/9.04 running on Asus netbooks using Atom CPUs. The install ran just fine. What I could do after the install depended on the OS version, as some had drivers while others didn'.
Not my experience. I got kernel panics for a few months after my first purchase of an Atom CPU, until the various Linux distribution maintainers caught up.
Edited 2009-11-09 22:48 UTC