Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 9th Nov 2009 21:29 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 393736
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Comment by flanque
by flanque on Tue 10th Nov 2009 04:50
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by flanque"
I think the trend is reversing for nvidia. Previously (currently) having an add-in card is a requirement for decent gaming performance, but going forward, once the shift to massive numbers of cores happens, having it all on the same chip will make more and more sense.
The add-in card I think will be just for the hard(er)core gamers.






Member since:
2006-03-16
You're one person indeed. But 95% of the market will do with anything that's cheap and that works. You just gave the best examples yourself: sound (and you can add LAN, IDE/SATA/USB/other-ports controllers etc). There isn't a need for dedicated HW expansion cards for 98% of the people. It's way cheaper with those integrated functionalities, consumes much less space/power than an expansion card and most importantly, it just works.
Currently NVidia is at the enthusiastics/specialized markets only, and almost by definition, it's a relatively small share of the market. Integrated HW sells to the vast majority of the market.
As a relative expert, gamer and developer myself, I can say that I'm quite happy with all my recent systems which had everything integrated less the GPU. Had there been a decent integrated GPU, I'd have probably bought it instead. It's cheaper and it works.
So integrated GPU has a huge current and potential market IMO. Possibly less profitable per system, but overall presents a very good growth opportunity for a company like NVidia. I wouldn't just dump the concept or potential market because some experts prefer discrete HW.