Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 10th Nov 2009 09:31 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 393777
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Not the right persons to judge...
by kragil on Tue 10th Nov 2009 10:40
in reply to "RE[2]: Not the right persons to judge..."
Well at the end of the day security is account separation, which is effectively dead is the new "streamlined UAC".
Compared to that other enhancement I read on http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd560691.aspx are just minor tweaks or meaningless to consumers, so IMO at least the default install(not the whole OS) is less secure. But defaults matter bigtime when you 94% market share.






Member since:
2005-06-29
This isn't entirely true. UAC is less secure, definitely - however, the operating system itself also has other new security features. In other words, calling the entire OS less secure is a bit premature.
Doesn't negate the fact the changes in UAC are braindead.