Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 13th Nov 2009 17:01 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 394914
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I thought the same in regards to why they chose the linux kernel. I think it would have been amazing to see a force like Google behind something like Haiku-OS or even buy out the BeOS code. Though, I must admit I'm not surprised they went with the Linux kernel. It's mature, stable and fast. I don't think that the user experience should reflect on the kernel. I think what most people outside of the geeksphere think about linux has nothing to do with the kernel but rather, the user experience with the tools/GUI interaction. Google can help the image by providing a simple, clean, fast OS directed toward the nongeeks of the world. We'll see how that goes.
Portability is probably the reason
by nt_jerkface on Tue 17th Nov 2009 08:45
in reply to "RE: Comment by MadRat"




Member since:
2006-02-17
I'm not surprised that Google didn't bolster a closed source non-mainstream OS. But I am surprised they went with Linux when so many foss options were available. I was hoping it was something like BeOS.
Linux just turns off too many MS Windows users to ever replace the latter. Putting lipstick on the pig - so to speak - doesn't cure the problem.