Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 17th Nov 2009 16:13 UTC

Thread beginning with comment 395116
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: An extreme but real example of two things
by tomcat on Tue 17th Nov 2009 21:52
in reply to "RE: An extreme but real example of two things"
RE[3]: An extreme but real example of two things
by sbergman27 on Tue 17th Nov 2009 22:27
in reply to "RE[2]: An extreme but real example of two things"
How, exactly, is the Linux kernel superior to the Windows kernel?
While I would not be inclined to make any sweeping statement such as "X is superior to Y", a willingness to open up the code to the wider world seems a good long term investment. Despite any ups and downs, my investment of confidence, professionally, has performed well over the years. I see no reason to abandon it. I would provisionally call that superior.
RE[3]: An extreme but real example of two things
by kragil on Tue 17th Nov 2009 22:52
in reply to "RE[2]: An extreme but real example of two things"
An open system can be better adapted to your needs.
Just look what the HPC guys are using.
New Top500
http://www.top500.org/stats/list/34/osfam
Member since:
2006-08-17
Yes, very true. Windows just feels right when it comes to a friendly desktop environment. Under Linux, gnome and KDE will always remain work in progress. This is sad because Linux kernel IS indeed superior to the windows kernel. It just isn't designed for a desktop computer mainly because kernel developers don't care about desktop users.